|  | 
    
        |  | 
    
        | 
            
                | 
                    
                        |  |  
                        | 
                            
                                | DENIS
                                GIFFORD'SMONSTERS OF
                                THE MOVIES
 (1977)
 |  | Monster
                                #32 - The Mummy |  |  
                        |  |  |  | 
    
        |  | 
    
        | 
            
                |  |  | 
 
 USA,
                1940 A Universal Pictures Production67 mins, black & white, 1.37:1 aspect ratio
 Shot on 35mm film
 Director - Christy CabanneWriter - Griffin Jay
 Screenplay - Griffin Jay, Maxwell Shane
 Cinematographer - Elwood Bredell
 Production Design - Jack Otterson, Russell A.
                Gausman (sets), Vera West (costumes)
 Make-Up - Jack P. Pierce (uncredited)
 Special Effects - Syd Pearson
 Editor - Philip Cahn
 Music - Hans J. Salter, Frank Skinner (both
                uncredited)
 Dick Foran
                (Steve Banning), Peggy Moran (Marta Solvani),
                Wallace Ford (Babe Jenson), Eduardo Ciannelli
                (High Priest), George Zucco (Andoheb), Cecil
                Kellaway (Mr Solvani), Tom Tyler (The Mummy) 
 |  | 
    
        |  | 
    
        | PLOT
        SUMMARY - Down on his luck
        archaeologist Steve Banning discovers a vase in Cairo
        that he believes could lead him to the ancient tomb of
        Princess Ananka. But unknown to him, his colleague
        Professor Andoheb is secretly also the High Priest of
        Karnak who holds the secrets to Kharis, a mummy guarding
        Ananka's tomb. Financed by a magician and his daughter,
        an expedition is launched to the grave site - where the
        awakended Kharis awaits them... | 
    
        |  | 
    
        | 
 | 
    
        |  | 
    
        | 
            
                | When Universal found itself with
                two immensely successful horror movies in 1931 - Dracula
                and Frankenstein - it was clear that
                more was to follow, and in 1932, the studio's new
                star Boris Karloff (billed as "Karloff the
                Uncanny") starred in The Mummy.
                Quite unlike Dracula and Frankenstein,
                however, The Mummy lacked a literary
                source, and this blank canvas was filled with an
                original story and screenplay by Richard Schayer
                and Nina Wilcox Putnam. The result was a movie
                full of what would become classic imagery and
                atmosphere. The
                Mummy never quite reached the level of
                awareness of its two predecessors, yet still
                enjoyed a moderate box office success and spawned
                several follow-up movies from Universal - of
                which The Mummy's Hand is the first. The movie is not an actual
                sequel, since the Mummy is now called Kharis (as
                opposed to Karloff's Imhotep) and is awakened by
                mystical leaves (and not a magic incantation from
                the life-giving "Scroll of Thoth"), but
                The Mummy's Hand itself saw three
                subsequent movies starring Kharis. |  |  Poster advertising Universal's
                1932 The Mummy with Boris Karloff
 |  | 
    
        |  | 
    
        | Whilst it is definitely the strongest of Universal's
        four movies featuring Kharis the Mummy, The Mummy's
        Hand does not compare too well to its predessor from
        1932. Produced in May and June of 1940 on a modest budget
        of $ 80,000, the movie was shot using a number of
        cost-cutting measures, which included inserting stock
        shots taken from the original  Mummy, using leftover
        studio sets from James Whale's film  Green Hell, and
        featuring a musical score almost entirely lifted from Son
        of Frankenstein (Weaver, Brunas & Brunas, 1990). | 
    
        |  | 
    
        | 
            
                | 
 |  | The result has its strong
                moments, but overall comes across as a fairly
                unbalanced end product which, even at a running
                time of just 67 minutes, takes forever to get
                into gear before ending on a stronger note. Tom Tyler, who previously
                appeared mostly in Westerns, underwent an
                excruciating make-up process which took hours to
                complete and left him unable to speak (Weaver,
                Brunas & Brunas, 1990), but his screen
                presence - although menacing enough - lacked the
                impact and weight Karloff had given the role
                under similar circumstances.  First released in the USA
                in September 1940, the movie received mostly
                underwhelming reviews and, unlike most other
                Universal horror movies from the 1930s and early
                1940s, was never reissued for theatrical release
                in the late 1940s and early 1950s (Weaver, Brunas
                & Brunas, 1990). The Mummy's Hand
                has been available in various forms since the
                days of laserdiscs and VHS cassettes; I only got
                around to watching it after buying Universal's
                2017 UK Bluray release (a double feature with the
                second Kharis movie, The Mummy's Tomb
                from 1942). The image and sound quality of this
                are excellent, given the age of the source
                material, and the 2k 1080p resolution provides
                for what is most likely the best quality release
                of this movie available. |  | 
    
        |  | 
    
        | Visually The Mummy's Hand
        is a solidly made film, but Universal are nowhere near at
        their best here, with The Mummy starring Boris
        Karloff being by far the better film - which somewhat
        begs the question why Denis Gifford chose this movie over
        the 1932 film. | 
    
        |  | 
    
        | 
            
                | The answer can be found in his  Pictorial History of Horror Movies: 
                    "[The Mummy]
                    also revealed a waste: Karloff's mummified
                    monster had walked in but one short scene.
                    Griffin Jay, a writer of radio mysteries,
                    elaborated that single sequence into a whole
                    new mythos [for The Mummy's Hand]."
                    (Gifford, 1973) In other words: whilst the
                1932 movie set the iconic theme and atmosphere,
                the iconic image of the bandage-wrapped Mummy
                constantly lurking towards its victims was
                introduced in The Mummy's Hand.  It also introduced the
                additional punishment of cutting out the
                perpetrator's tongue prior to embalming him
                alive, "so the ears of the Gods would
                not be assailed by his unholy curses".
                It became a firm element of the Mummy mythos and
                was shown in a graphic (for the time) scene in
                Hammer's 1959 colour remake with Christopher Lee
                as the Mummy - which is also based on the Kharis
                story, not the 1932 Imhotep setting.  |  |  Original 1967 Lobby Card for
                Hammer's  The Mummy's Shroud
 (personal collection)
 |  | 
    
        |  | 
    
        | All subsequent Hammer Mummy
        movies contain at least some plot elelements or visuals
        going back to The Mummy's Hand, making it just
        as influential a movie as the original Mummy
        from 1932. A good pick by Denis Gifford after all. | 
    
        |  | 
    
        |  | 
    
        |  | 
    
        |  | 
    
        |  | 
    
        | 
            
                |  |  
                | 
                    
                        |  |  |  Denis Gifford on The
                        Mummy's Handin A Pictorial History of
                        Horror Movies (1973)
 "The
                        Mummy's Hand (1940) was economical yet
                        looked expensive, thanks to its use of
                        the temple from Green Hell. It also used
                        the entire foggy flashback of Karloff's
                        incarceration (...) Im-Ho-Tep has changed
                        his name to Kharis. No longer a High
                        Priest, he is a Prince, in love with
                        Princess Anananka. When she dies he
                        steals not the Scroll of Thoth, but the
                        forbidden Tana leaves, the juice of which
                        will revive the dead. Caught, he is
                        buried alive." |  |  |  |  
                |  |  | 
    
        |  | 
    
        |  | 
    
        | SOURCES GIFFORD
        Denis (1973) A Pictorial History of Horror Movies,
        Hamlyn WEAVER Tom,
        Michael Brunas & John Brunas (1990) Universal
        Horrors, McFarland & Co | 
    
        |  | 
    
        |  Back to main index page
 | 
    
        |  | 
    
        | 
 | 
    
        |  | 
    
        | 
            
                | The illustrations presented here are
                copyright material.Their reproduction in this non-commercial review
                and research context is considered to be fair use
 as set out by the U.S. Copyright Act of 1976, 17
                U.S.C. par. 107
 and in accordance with the the Berne Convention  
                
                for the Protection of Literary and
                Artistic Works.
  All images from
                Monsters of the Movies
                (Carousel/Transworld) were scanned from my
                personal copy purchased in 1977All images of Blu-ray or DVD covers were scanned
                from my personal copies
 All images of lobby cards were scanned from
                copies in my personal collection
 Page created 8
                July 2023Last updated 2 September 2023
 (c)
                2023  
  |  | 
    
        |  |